nt4-ever wrote:
> re earlier thread i checked my win-NT4
> NTFS version
> (i never did service pack 4; just 3,5,6a)
Service Packs are cumulative, each successive pack contains earlier
packs. So if you installed SP5 or SP6a you have in fact installed SP4.
> http://thinkpads.com/WinXP_Comments1.htm
> (instructions for using dskprobe to determine
> NTFS version - makes brain surgery or
> rocket science seem trivial)
>
> 2nd line after the 70 line was 01 02
> so my NTFS is still 1.2 ??
That would confirm my suspicions that there are errors in KB872952 (
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/872952 ), the article states:
"When you apply Service Pack 4 (SP4) to Windows NT 4.0, NTFS is upgraded
to the version of NTFS that is used in Microsoft Windows 2000 and in
later versions of Windows."
Yet, in another article (
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/310749 ) there
appears to be contradictory or inconsistent information:
"The version of NTFS included with Windows XP cannot be interpreted
correctly by Windows NT 4.0. However, there is an updated Ntfs.sys
driver in Windows NT 4.0 SP4 that enables Windows NT 4.0 to read from
and write to NTFS volumes in Windows XP"
No mention there that the actual file system is changed by SP4, simply a
mention of an upgraded ntfs driver. These two articles appear to offer
different or inconsistent information and your findings also appear to
contradict kb872952.
> these might help?
> NTFSCHK - run win-2000 chkdsk from NT4
> http://web.archive.org/web/20060819014420/www.sysinternals.com/Utiliti...NtfsChk
>
> change NTFS from win-2000 version back
> to NT4 version:
> http://www.vamos.de/english/bootman2.html#zu_w2
> ftp://ftp.vamos.de/pub/vamos/Mark4NTFS.zip
While simply masquerading NTFS v3.x as v1.2 may allow the NT4 version of
chkdsk to run, that may offer false security. The NT4 chkdsk version
simply cannot properly repair NTFS 3.x, the Sysinternal solution or the
hotfix offered by Microsoft would be preferable. If one were to call
Microsoft I wonder if they would be able to get the hotfix. No harm in
trying I guess.
John