Perhaps the film is evolving on its own and a few months from now will
be completely different than how it was originally shot.
i wouldn't put it past Lynch to have to power to do such an impossible
thing - he is a genius.
if i notice any differences i'll mention it.
On Mar 10, 6:54 pm, "boogie" <boo....TakeThisOut@popup.net> wrote:
> So back in December I see INLAND EMPIRE for the first time, and a week
> ago saw it for a second time.
>
> I did notice two particular scenes I remembered from the first viewing were
> not in
> the second screening.
>
> One was a shot of Dern, I believe who was seated, and the camera zoomed
> either in or
> out of headshot. This looked rather non-professional, if not, almost like a
> mistake was
> made and was being compensated for.
>
> The second scene was when the girls in the room were talkin, and one of them
> lifted her
> shirt to reveal her top. Now, these breast were rather large, and may I add,
> perky.
> But in the second screening it was a different girl who lifted her shirt. It
> was just not the
> same set as the first ones I saw.
>
> Did any one else notice this, or scenes that appeared different from first
> and second viewing?
>
> Soooo Strange...
Movies