|
|
| Next: Stanley Kubrick joined a Buddhist Sect |
| Author |
Message |
blue External

Since: Nov 01, 2006 Posts: 141
|
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 11:25 pm Post subject: Come back Bullingdon we need you for a duel Archived from groups: alt>movies>kubrick (more info?) |
|
|
Old Man Kelps has started trolling real bad. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Wordsmith External

Since: Jun 01, 2007 Posts: 19
|
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 11:25 pm Post subject: Re: Come back Bullingdon we need you for a duel [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?) |
|
|
On Jul 19, 5:25 pm, blue wrote:
> Old Man Kelps has started trolling real bad.
Padriag, we hardly knew ye.
W : ( |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Harry Bailey External

Since: Jun 04, 2007 Posts: 46
|
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 2:25 pm Post subject: Re: Come back Bullingdon we need you for a duel [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?) |
|
|
On Jul 20, 7:33 pm, wrote:
>
> Secondly, Y/K is NOT a true or practicing Buddhist because he does NOT
> practice one
> of the main tenets of the dharma which is to engage in mindful speech
> and listening; this includes
> mindful writing and reading of posts on AMK and elsewhere [on the
> Internet and in print]. (His views on Buddhism just sound
> like another LA-appropriation-consumerist take on eastern religions,
> anyway - help me here, Harry!
Maybe one way of looking at this, by no means the only one, is to
consider the 'status' of the religious fundamentalist, whether he/she
is Christian or Muslim or Buddhist or Psychedelic New-Ageist etc. Are
they 'truly' fundamentalists? There is a feature that clearly
distinguishes all authentic fundamentalists, from Tibetan Buddhists to
the Amish [and we all remember Peter Weir's 'Witness' from long ago in
this regard ...] in the US: the absence of resentment and envy and
ontological insecurity, the deep indifference they have towards the
non-believers' way of life. Since the 'genuine religious
fundamentalists' are such that they really believe they have found
their way to Truth and Enlightenment, why should they feel threatened
by non-believers, why should they envy or resent them? When a Tibetan
Buddhist encounters a Western New-Ageist hedonist, he is far from
condemning him; he just benevolently notes that the hedonist's search
for happiness is self-defeating. The contrast cannot be stronger to
the aggressively self-righteous ('missionary') pseudo-fundamentalists
who are deeply bothered, intrigued, fascinated, by the 'lost soul'
life of the non-believers - one can feel that, in fighting the non-
believing other, they are fighting their own temptation [or
destructively disgusted by the lie that is their fake, precious
Ego] ... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
You can post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
| |
|
|