Zodiac and Jim Schembri

WaKkA · External Since: May 18, 2007 Posts: 1

Has anyone seen Zodiac as yet? Just saw the Age film reviewer, Jim
Schembri give it 1 star, while At the Movie(Margaret and David both
loved it- 4 1/2 stars each) gave it a more positive review.
Going to see it myself today, looking forwards to seeing it(big
Fincher fan), I can't believe someone like Jim Schembri(but not
surprising either) gave this film a poor review.

Ian Galbraith · External Since: Feb 16, 2005 Posts: 311

On Fri, 18 May 2007 10:01:12 +1000, WaKkA wrote:

> Has anyone seen Zodiac as yet? Just saw the Age film reviewer, Jim
> Schembri give it 1 star, while At the Movie(Margaret and David both
> loved it- 4 1/2 stars each) gave it a more positive review.
> Going to see it myself today, looking forwards to seeing it(big
> Fincher fan), I can't believe someone like Jim Schembri(but not
> surprising either) gave this film a poor review.

Schembri is close to the worst film reviewer in Australia, his reviews
are not indicative of anything.

--
"In a hierarchy, every employee tends to rise to his level of
incompetence." - The Peter Principle

alphakitten · External Since: Mar 02, 2004 Posts: 49

WaKkA wrote:
> Has anyone seen Zodiac as yet? Just saw the Age film reviewer, Jim
> Schembri give it 1 star, while At the Movie(Margaret and David both
> loved it- 4 1/2 stars each) gave it a more positive review.
> Going to see it myself today, looking forwards to seeing it(big
> Fincher fan), I can't believe someone like Jim Schembri(but not
> surprising either) gave this film a poor review.
>

Schembri's a notorious douche. Zodiac is excellent.

~Angel

Chris Mayer · External Since: May 19, 2007 Posts: 1

Ian Galbraith wrote:
> On Fri, 18 May 2007 10:01:12 +1000, WaKkA wrote:
>
>> Has anyone seen Zodiac as yet? Just saw the Age film reviewer, Jim
>> Schembri give it 1 star, while At the Movie(Margaret and David both
>> loved it- 4 1/2 stars each) gave it a more positive review.
>> Going to see it myself today, looking forwards to seeing it(big
>> Fincher fan), I can't believe someone like Jim Schembri(but not
>> surprising either) gave this film a poor review.
>
> Schembri is close to the worst film reviewer in Australia, his reviews
> are not indicative of anything.
>

Well usually they are inversly indicative of what the rest of the world
thinks!

V01TeK · External Since: May 19, 2007 Posts: 41

> Schembri is close to the worst film reviewer in Australia,

Ah, then you can't be familiar with the Sunday Herald's Rob Lowing. Imagine
if Kath from "Kath and Kim" were a film critic.
--
________________________
"Your signature quote is not as funny/clever as you think it is."
Chris