Help!

[gentoo-dev] About XFCE, renames, eclass, etc

 
  

Post new topic   General Reply to Topic (not reply to a specific post)    Forums Home -> Development RSS
Next:  Accepted coreutils 7.5-1 (source all i386)  
Author Message
Jeremy Olexa
External


Since: Aug 12, 2009
Posts: 5



PostPosted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 11:10 pm    Post subject: [gentoo-dev] About XFCE, renames, eclass, etc
Archived from groups: linux>gentoo>dev (more info?)

Hello all,
You /may/ have noticed some fuzz going on with XFCE lately. Here is a
quick outline of what Samuli and myself (mainly him though with my
'consulting' =P ) have been doing.

- pkg renames: We want to match what upstream calls the packages. This
includes renaming plugins to $foo-plugin instead of just $foo. But not
ALL plugins, again we are only matching what upstream calls them
(inclusive of inconsistency by upstream)

- xfce4.eclass vs xfconf.eclass: xfce4.eclass was basically useless due
to upstream changes and it was confusing to users and devs alike. Since
this eclass went from useful to people that knew it (before me) to a
monster that didn't help anyone (now) it was deprecated. No ebuilds use
it now and none should in the future. Use xfconf.eclass now, it was
re-written from scratch and went through a few iterations to become the
main xfce-related eclass. It is very useful for us, now.

- xfce-extras meta package: The meta package has left the tree in favor
of the renames and ability to allow the user to choose what to install.
A meta package /might/ come back in the form of a @set, but not soon.
This decision was heavily based on community feedback:
http://blog.jolexa.net/2009/08/01/gentoo-how-to-handle-xfce-extras/

- xfce-config.xml: http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/xfce-config.xml Josh
(nightmorph) updated this, basically an after thought by us so thanks Josh!

- xfce4-meta : former name xfce-base/xfce4. Renamed to reflect reality.
This meta package is the *core* of XFCE, it *only* has in it what is
required to run. Thus, returning XFCE to a minimalistic status in Gentoo
Linux. This is desired because most XFCE users are looking for a
lightweight WM, not a heavy DE. So, users will have to add a terminal,
orage, thunar, etc to the world file instead of relying on a meta package.

- xfce-4.4 was removed. Sorry mips, Samuli gave you time to add your
approval to 4.6, but it never happened.

- Stabilization requests, just bringing the stable tree more up2date and
preparing for inclusion into the LiveDVD if desired by the LiveDVD builders.

Hope that helps anyone that was wondering wtf was going on lately =D
-Jeremy
Back to top
Eray Aslan
External


Since: Apr 20, 2007
Posts: 5



PostPosted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:10 am    Post subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] About XFCE, renames, eclass, etc [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On 03.09.2009 05:38, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
> - xfce4-meta : former name xfce-base/xfce4. Renamed to reflect reality.
> This meta package is the *core* of XFCE, it *only* has in it what is
> required to run. Thus, returning XFCE to a minimalistic status in Gentoo
> Linux. This is desired because most XFCE users are looking for a
> lightweight WM, not a heavy DE. So, users will have to add a terminal,
> orage, thunar, etc to the world file instead of relying on a meta package.

Thanks a lot for the update and for the awesome work. One note for the
future:

An ewarn would have been nice for the above point. emerge --depclean
output was a surprise (wanted to unmerge terminal etc) and surprise is
bad. We don't want any surprises.

Thanks again.
--
Eray
Back to top
Jeremy Olexa
External


Since: Aug 12, 2009
Posts: 5



PostPosted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:10 pm    Post subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] About XFCE, renames, eclass, etc [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Eray Aslan wrote:
> On 03.09.2009 05:38, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
>> - xfce4-meta : former name xfce-base/xfce4. Renamed to reflect reality.
>> This meta package is the *core* of XFCE, it *only* has in it what is
>> required to run. Thus, returning XFCE to a minimalistic status in Gentoo
>> Linux. This is desired because most XFCE users are looking for a
>> lightweight WM, not a heavy DE. So, users will have to add a terminal,
>> orage, thunar, etc to the world file instead of relying on a meta package.
>
> Thanks a lot for the update and for the awesome work. One note for the
> future:
>
> An ewarn would have been nice for the above point. emerge --depclean
> output was a surprise (wanted to unmerge terminal etc) and surprise is
> bad. We don't want any surprises.
>
> Thanks again.

I just added this:

* xfce4-meta will just provide a minimal set of packages. You may also
* want to emerge x11-terms/terminal, app-editors/mousepad,
* app-office/orage, etc or similar packages.
* More info can be found at:
* http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/xfce-config.xml

Hope that helps.
-Jeremy
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   General Reply to Topic (not reply to a specific post)    Forums Home -> Development All times are: Eastern Time (US & Canada) (change)
Page 1 of 1

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum