Help!

em86


Post new topic   General Reply to Topic (not reply to a specific post)    Forums Home -> Digital Alpha RSS
Next:  Problem with HP Surestore40 dat drive & Symbi..  
Author Message
Davide Cittaro
External


Since: Nov 29, 2005
Posts: 2



PostPosted: Tue Nov 29, 2005 8:55 am    Post subject: em86
Archived from groups: comp>os>linux>alpha (more info?)

Hi all, I'm trying to install em86 on my alpha DS25 running Gentoo
(2.4.30smp). Since I had many problems in compiling it, I'm trying to
install the RPMs found at the digital ftp.
so:

# rpm -ivh em86-0.4-1.alpha.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
libm.so.6.1 is needed by em86-0.4-1
libdl.so.2.1 is needed by em86-0.4-1
libc.so.6.1 is needed by em86-0.4-1
ld-linux.so.2 is needed by em86-0.4-1

and I have to give --nodeps as option. I can install
em-x86-0.2-1.i386.rpm but then:

# rpm -ivh --force em86-baselibs-0.2-1.alpha.rpm
Preparing... ###########################################
[100%]
1:em86-baselibs ###########################################
[100%]
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.50242: line 1: 27294 Segmentation fault
/usr/bin/ldconfig86
error: %post(em86-baselibs-0.2-1) scriptlet failed, exit status 139

Any hint?

d
--
Davide Cittaro
Drop WINDOWS if you want to reply
Back to top
Michal Jaegermann
External


Since: Jun 06, 2004
Posts: 62



PostPosted: Tue Nov 29, 2005 5:55 pm    Post subject: Re: em86 [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Davide Cittaro <me.RemoveThis@adomain.no> wrote:
> Hi all, I'm trying to install em86 on my alpha DS25 running Gentoo
> (2.4.30smp). Since I had many problems in compiling it, I'm trying to
> install the RPMs found at the digital ftp.
> so:
>
> # rpm -ivh em86-0.4-1.alpha.rpm
> error: Failed dependencies:
> libm.so.6.1 is needed by em86-0.4-1
> libdl.so.2.1 is needed by em86-0.4-1
> libc.so.6.1 is needed by em86-0.4-1
> ld-linux.so.2 is needed by em86-0.4-1

That is correct. em86 depends on a presence of rather particular
version of glibc (and, IIRC as this was years I played with that
thing for the last time, these are x86 libraries you are looking at).

> and I have to give --nodeps as option.

You are not likely to go here very far with that.

> /usr/bin/ldconfig86

That is the point. You are trying to configure here a dynamic loading
for x86 libraries to use by programs you try to run under em86. You may
look for these in old distros where em86 was present and later try to
play with LD_LIBRARY_PATH and/or LD_PRELOAD in some wrappers to get
particular libraries loaded. In any case you need to be careful where
and how you are unpacking those old packages as you do not want to
clobber something entirely different which happens to have the same
name.

Saying that this is not likely to work. em86 was really a big hack
which depended heavily on an "inside knowledge" of a particular person,
i.e. Jim Paradis, and I think that he was under some sort of NDA -
formal or informal. When he moved on and DEC falled apart there was
no way to maintain that thing.

What is you attempt to run that way? It is possible that you have
other options to achieve the same or similar goals.

Michal
Back to top
Måns_Rullgård
External


Since: Jul 29, 2004
Posts: 951



PostPosted: Tue Nov 29, 2005 9:55 pm    Post subject: Re: em86 [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

DiskMan <nobody.TakeThisOut@thewheel.com> writes:

> I hate to tell you this but don't even bother. If you manage to get them
> installed and 'working' all you're going to get is a reallocation error
> and thats it... The version of Binutils/GCC used to compile that mess is
> damn near ancient! Trust me on that...

I gave up on that one years ago too. It required some more or less
petrified C libraries, both x86 and native, to run. Needless to say,
nothing else works with those library versions.

--
Måns Rullgård
mru.TakeThisOut@inprovide.com
Back to top
Davide Cittaro
External


Since: Nov 29, 2005
Posts: 2



PostPosted: Wed Nov 30, 2005 4:55 am    Post subject: Re: em86 [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Michal Jaegermann <michal RemoveThis @gortel.phys.ualberta.ca> wrote:
> What is you attempt to run that way? It is possible that you have
> other options to achieve the same or similar goals.

I'm trying to run some proprietary software distributed as binaries for
linux on x86...

d

--
Davide Cittaro
Drop WINDOWS if you want to reply
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   General Reply to Topic (not reply to a specific post)    Forums Home -> Digital Alpha All times are: Eastern Time (US & Canada) (change)
Page 1 of 1

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum