|
|
| Next: Location of API docs |
| Author |
Message |
Paul Cager
External
Since: Nov 29, 2006
Posts: 32
|
 Posted: Thu Jan 11, 2007 8:10 pm Post subject: checkstyle Java library - binary package name
Archived from groups: linux>debian>maint>java (more info?) |
|
|
Regarding the packaging of the new upstream version of checkstyle. As it
is a library, should I rename the binary package to libcheckstyle-java, or
would this cause far too many problems?
Thanks,
Paul
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-REQUEST.RemoveThis@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster.RemoveThis@lists.debian.org |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Michael Koch
External
Since: Feb 18, 2005
Posts: 543
|
Posted: Thu Jan 11, 2007 8:30 pm Post subject: Re: checkstyle Java library - binary package name [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?) |
|
|
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 06:51:08PM -0000, Paul Cager wrote:
> Regarding the packaging of the new upstream version of checkstyle. As it
> is a library, should I rename the binary package to libcheckstyle-java, or
> would this cause far too many problems?
We discussed this specific case a long time ago and this package is
both: a library and a command. I vote for leaving the name as it is.
Michael
--
.''`. | Michael Koch <konqueror.DeleteThis@gmx.de>
: :' : | Free Java Developer <http://www.classpath.org>
`. `' |
`- | 1024D/BAC5 4B28 D436 95E6 F2E0 BD11 5923 A008 2763 483B
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-REQUEST.DeleteThis@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster.DeleteThis@lists.debian.org |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Arnaud Vandyck
External
Since: Nov 14, 2006
Posts: 44
|
Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 12:00 pm Post subject: Re: checkstyle Java library - binary package name [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?) |
|
|
On 1/11/07, Michael Koch <konqueror.DeleteThis@gmx.de> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 06:51:08PM -0000, Paul Cager wrote:
> > Regarding the packaging of the new upstream version of checkstyle. As it
> > is a library, should I rename the binary package to libcheckstyle-java, or
> > would this cause far too many problems?
>
> We discussed this specific case a long time ago and this package is
> both: a library and a command. I vote for leaving the name as it is.
Seconded.
--
Arnaud Vandyck
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-REQUEST.DeleteThis@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster.DeleteThis@lists.debian.org |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Barry Hawkins
External
Since: Nov 17, 2004
Posts: 48
|
Posted: Mon Jan 15, 2007 9:10 pm Post subject: Re: checkstyle Java library - binary package name [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?) |
|
|
Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> On 1/11/07, Michael Koch <konqueror DeleteThis @gmx.de> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 06:51:08PM -0000, Paul Cager wrote:
>> > Regarding the packaging of the new upstream version of checkstyle.
>> As it
>> > is a library, should I rename the binary package to
>> libcheckstyle-java, or
>> > would this cause far too many problems?
>>
>> We discussed this specific case a long time ago and this package is
>> both: a library and a command. I vote for leaving the name as it is.
>
> Seconded.
>
+1; checkstyle definitely falls into that dual-role status we've
discussed in the past.
--
Barry Hawkins
All Things Computed
site: http://www.alltc.com
weblog: http://www.yepthatsme.com
Registered Linux User #368650
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-REQUEST DeleteThis @lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster DeleteThis @lists.debian.org |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
| |
|
|
Linux