|
|
| Next: maven 2.0.6 |
| Author |
Message |
Arnaud Vandyck External

Since: Nov 14, 2006 Posts: 44
|
Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2007 3:00 pm Post subject: [RFC] Should we remove xerces-j (libxerces-java 1.4.4) Archived from groups: linux>debian>maint>java (more info?) |
|
|
Hi,
I was looking at some bug reports and found one about xerces-j (remove
uploaders). I was not able to build it (#418841). Also, last upstream
upload is "13-Oct-2003 10:38". Only argouml (#418864), libgef-java
(#418865) and arbortext-catalog(#418844) depends on it. (I discovered
arbortext-catalog java classes are not built from sources: #418866).
I think Stefan Gybas would agree if pkg-java took the package so I
have just one question:
Do we fix it or do we remove it?
Thanks for your time,
--
Arnaud Vandyck
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-REQUEST DeleteThis @lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster DeleteThis @lists.debian.org |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Marcus Better External

Since: Nov 19, 2004 Posts: 393
|
Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2007 3:30 pm Post subject: Re: [RFC] Should we remove xerces-j (libxerces-java 1.4.4) [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?) |
|
|
popcon reports 516 installs, versus 22756 for libxerces2-java. For the
dependents, there are 172 of argouml, 222 of libgef-java and 67 of
arbortext-catalog, so apparently some people did install it separately.
Nevertheless I don't think it makes sense to keep it in lenny.
Marcus
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-REQUEST RemoveThis @lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster RemoveThis @lists.debian.org |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Arnaud Vandyck External

Since: Oct 30, 2006 Posts: 66
|
Posted: Sun Jul 01, 2007 11:10 am Post subject: Re: [RFC] Should we remove xerces-j (libxerces-java 1.4.4) [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?) |
|
|
The RC bug has been closed, but moving argouml, libgef-java and
arbortext-catalog to xerces2 should be done. And then, remove xerces1.
On 4/12/07, Marcus Better <marcus DeleteThis @better.se> wrote:
> popcon reports 516 installs, versus 22756 for libxerces2-java. For the
> dependents, there are 172 of argouml, 222 of libgef-java and 67 of
> arbortext-catalog, so apparently some people did install it separately.
>
> Nevertheless I don't think it makes sense to keep it in lenny.
--
Arnaud Vandyck
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-REQUEST DeleteThis @lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster DeleteThis @lists.debian.org |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Marcus Better External

Since: Nov 19, 2004 Posts: 393
|
Posted: Sun Jul 01, 2007 4:10 pm Post subject: Re: [RFC] Should we remove xerces-j (libxerces-java 1.4.4) [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?) |
|
|
Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> The RC bug has been closed, but moving argouml, libgef-java and
> arbortext-catalog to xerces2 should be done. And then, remove xerces1.
Care to file some bugs?
Marcus
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-REQUEST RemoveThis @lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster RemoveThis @lists.debian.org |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Arnaud Vandyck External

Since: Oct 30, 2006 Posts: 66
|
Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2007 2:20 pm Post subject: Re: [RFC] Should we remove xerces-j (libxerces-java 1.4.4) [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?) |
|
|
On 7/1/07, Marcus Better <marcus DeleteThis @better.se> wrote:
> Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> > The RC bug has been closed, but moving argouml, libgef-java and
> > arbortext-catalog to xerces2 should be done. And then, remove xerces1.
>
> Care to file some bugs?
OK, I'll do that asap
--
Arnaud Vandyck
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-REQUEST DeleteThis @lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster DeleteThis @lists.debian.org |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Arnaud Vandyck External

Since: Oct 30, 2006 Posts: 66
|
Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2007 10:40 pm Post subject: Re: [RFC] Should we remove xerces-j (libxerces-java 1.4.4) [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?) |
|
|
On 7/2/07, Arnaud Vandyck <avandyck.DeleteThis@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 7/1/07, Marcus Better <marcus.DeleteThis@better.se> wrote:
> > Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> > > The RC bug has been closed, but moving argouml, libgef-java and
> > > arbortext-catalog to xerces2 should be done. And then, remove xerces1.
> >
> > Care to file some bugs?
I already did it for arbortext-catalog:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=418844
I've already remove the dep for libgef-java, I'll work on argouml.
--
Arnaud Vandyck
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-REQUEST.DeleteThis@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster.DeleteThis@lists.debian.org |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
You can post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
| |
|
|