Linux's share of netbooks surging

Rick · External Since: Oct 18, 2009 Posts: 83

Linux's share of netbooks surging, not sagging, says analyst

<http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9140343/
Linux_s_share_of_netbooks_surging_not_sagging_says_analyst>

"Nearly one-third of the 35 million netbooks on track to ship this year
will come with some variant of the free, open-source operating system,
ABI Research said."

well, now.... almost a third with Linux systems... but the wintrolls say
no one wants netbooks with Linux systems.

So, will the wintrolls attack the article, or just ignore it and hope no
one notices?
--
Rick

DFS · External Since: Jun 07, 2005 Posts: 3577

Rick wrote:
> Linux's share of netbooks surging, not sagging, says analyst
>
> <http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9140343/
> Linux_s_share_of_netbooks_surging_not_sagging_says_analyst>
>
> "Nearly one-third of the 35 million netbooks on track to ship this
> year will come with some variant of the free, open-source operating
> system, ABI Research said."
>
>
> well, now.... almost a third with Linux systems... but the wintrolls
> say no one wants netbooks with Linux systems.
>
> So, will the wintrolls attack the article, or just ignore it and hope
> no one notices?

Read the article, (p)Rick:

It's horseshit. Almost nobody buys a Linux anything - inside or outside the
US - when they know it runs Linux. Add a Microsoft alternative and game is
over.

"he declined to confirm that with any hard statistics."

Why? What's to hide - except his reputation?

Then it states "As netbooks running the ARM processor become a major factor,
Orr predicted Linux will overtake Windows on netbooks by 2013."

LMAO!! uh huh... does he mean overtake like Linux "overtook" desktop
Windows in the last 5 years? Does he think MS will sit still and cede that
market to a competing product without a fight?

His boss should reprimand him for being a Linux bozo with no grasp of
reality.

Snit · External Since: Jan 09, 2009 Posts: 261

Rick stated in post Y6udnV1xeYw5I2_XnZ2dnUVZ_hFi4p2d.DeleteThis@supernews.com on
11/5/09 5:01 AM:

> Linux's share of netbooks surging, not sagging, says analyst
>
> <http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9140343/
> Linux_s_share_of_netbooks_surging_not_sagging_says_analyst>
>
> "Nearly one-third of the 35 million netbooks on track to ship this year
> will come with some variant of the free, open-source operating system,
> ABI Research said."
>
>
> well, now.... almost a third with Linux systems... but the wintrolls say
> no one wants netbooks with Linux systems.
>
> So, will the wintrolls attack the article, or just ignore it and hope no
> one notices?

A "variant of the free, open-source operating system"? So they are not
different Linux-based OSs but all one OS?

--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]

Chris Ahlstrom · External Since: Jan 08, 2009 Posts: 484

Rick pulled this Usenet boner:

> Linux's share of netbooks surging, not sagging, says analyst
>
> <http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9140343/
> Linux_s_share_of_netbooks_surging_not_sagging_says_analyst>
>
> "Nearly one-third of the 35 million netbooks on track to ship this year
> will come with some variant of the free, open-source operating system,
> ABI Research said."
>
> well, now.... almost a third with Linux systems... but the wintrolls say
> no one wants netbooks with Linux systems.
>
> So, will the wintrolls attack the article, or just ignore it and hope no
> one notices?

The WinTrolls can still take solace in the 1%. Very Happy

--
Tuesday After Lunch is the cosmic time of the week.

Rick · External Since: Nov 05, 2009 Posts: 1

DFS wrote:
> Rick wrote:
>> Linux's share of netbooks surging, not sagging, says analyst
>>
>> <http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9140343/
>> Linux_s_share_of_netbooks_surging_not_sagging_says_analyst>
>>
>> "Nearly one-third of the 35 million netbooks on track to ship this
>> year will come with some variant of the free, open-source operating
>> system, ABI Research said."
>>
>>
>> well, now.... almost a third with Linux systems... but the wintrolls
>> say no one wants netbooks with Linux systems.
>>
>> So, will the wintrolls attack the article, or just ignore it and hope
>> no one notices?

.... almost 1 1/2 hours... took longer than I thought.

>
>
> Read the article, (p)Rick:
Let me know when you grow up, kindergarten boy.

Hadron · External Since: Dec 05, 2006 Posts: 495

Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc.TakeThisOut@launchmodem.com> writes:

> Rick pulled this Usenet boner:
>
>> Linux's share of netbooks surging, not sagging, says analyst
>>
>> <http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9140343/
>> Linux_s_share_of_netbooks_surging_not_sagging_says_analyst>
>>
>> "Nearly one-third of the 35 million netbooks on track to ship this year
>> will come with some variant of the free, open-source operating system,
>> ABI Research said."
>>
>> well, now.... almost a third with Linux systems... but the wintrolls say
>> no one wants netbooks with Linux systems.
>>
>> So, will the wintrolls attack the article, or just ignore it and hope no
>> one notices?
>
> The WinTrolls can still take solace in the 1%. Very Happy

Looks like the resident kiss arse didn't read the article he's now
shilling. No surprise there.

1) Netbooks are a smaller percentage of PCs.
2) "Orr said Ubuntu is a popular choice on netbooks, though he declined
to confirm that with any hard statistics.". Surprise eh?
3) "As netbooks running the ARM processor become a major factor, Orr
predicted Linux will overtake Windows on netbooks by 2013". Predicted.
4) "In a statement, Microsoft maintained that "over 93% of worldwide
small notebook PCs run Windows today.".

In fact the only figures he backs up is

5) "ABI said its 35 million shipment figure is a reaffirmation of an
earlier forecast that itself was a slight tweak of its January forecast
of 39 million netbook shipments in 2009."

No mention of Linux there.

John Fuhrer · External Since: Nov 03, 2009 Posts: 76

On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 08:20:39 -0500, DFS wrote:

> Rick wrote:
>> Linux's share of netbooks surging, not sagging, says analyst
>>
>> <http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9140343/
>> Linux_s_share_of_netbooks_surging_not_sagging_says_analyst>
>>
>> "Nearly one-third of the 35 million netbooks on track to ship this
>> year will come with some variant of the free, open-source operating
>> system, ABI Research said."
>>
>>
>> well, now.... almost a third with Linux systems... but the wintrolls
>> say no one wants netbooks with Linux systems.
>>
>> So, will the wintrolls attack the article, or just ignore it and hope
>> no one notices?
>
>
> Read the article, (p)Rick:
>
> It's horseshit. Almost nobody buys a Linux anything - inside or outside the
> US - when they know it runs Linux. Add a Microsoft alternative and game is
> over.
>
> "he declined to confirm that with any hard statistics."
>
> Why? What's to hide - except his reputation?

Lenovo is dumping the Linux netbooks because they said people keep
returning them because they think they are broken!

How true.

Linux *is* broken.

>
> Then it states "As netbooks running the ARM processor become a major factor,
> Orr predicted Linux will overtake Windows on netbooks by 2013."
>
> LMAO!! uh huh... does he mean overtake like Linux "overtook" desktop
> Windows in the last 5 years? Does he think MS will sit still and cede that
> market to a competing product without a fight?

Tell that to Lenovo.

> His boss should reprimand him for being a Linux bozo with no grasp of
> reality.

He will be out looking for a job shortly.

John Fuhrer · External Since: Nov 03, 2009 Posts: 76

On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 17:36:18 +0100, Hadron wrote:

> Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc.RemoveThis@launchmodem.com> writes:
>
>> Rick pulled this Usenet boner:
>>
>>> Linux's share of netbooks surging, not sagging, says analyst
>>>
>>> <http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9140343/
>>> Linux_s_share_of_netbooks_surging_not_sagging_says_analyst>
>>>
>>> "Nearly one-third of the 35 million netbooks on track to ship this year
>>> will come with some variant of the free, open-source operating system,
>>> ABI Research said."
>>>
>>> well, now.... almost a third with Linux systems... but the wintrolls say
>>> no one wants netbooks with Linux systems.
>>>
>>> So, will the wintrolls attack the article, or just ignore it and hope no
>>> one notices?
>>
>> The WinTrolls can still take solace in the 1%. Very Happy

>
> Looks like the resident kiss arse didn't read the article he's now
> shilling. No surprise there.
>
> 1) Netbooks are a smaller percentage of PCs.
> 2) "Orr said Ubuntu is a popular choice on netbooks, though he declined
> to confirm that with any hard statistics.". Surprise eh?
> 3) "As netbooks running the ARM processor become a major factor, Orr
> predicted Linux will overtake Windows on netbooks by 2013". Predicted.
> 4) "In a statement, Microsoft maintained that "over 93% of worldwide
> small notebook PCs run Windows today.".
>
> In fact the only figures he backs up is
>
> 5) "ABI said its 35 million shipment figure is a reaffirmation of an
> earlier forecast that itself was a slight tweak of its January forecast
> of 39 million netbook shipments in 2009."
>
> No mention of Linux there.

It's hard to read when his tounge is firmly planted up Spamowitz's
sphincter.
I wonder how he types?

Rick · External Since: Oct 18, 2009 Posts: 83

On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 14:22:44 -0500, John Fuhrer wrote:

> On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 08:20:39 -0500, DFS wrote:
>
>> Rick wrote:
>>> Linux's share of netbooks surging, not sagging, says analyst
>>>
>>> <http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9140343/
>>> Linux_s_share_of_netbooks_surging_not_sagging_says_analyst>
>>>
>>> "Nearly one-third of the 35 million netbooks on track to ship this
>>> year will come with some variant of the free, open-source operating
>>> system, ABI Research said."
>>>
>>>
>>> well, now.... almost a third with Linux systems... but the wintrolls
>>> say no one wants netbooks with Linux systems.
>>>
>>> So, will the wintrolls attack the article, or just ignore it and hope
>>> no one notices?
>>
>>
>> Read the article, (p)Rick:
>>
>> It's horseshit. Almost nobody buys a Linux anything - inside or
>> outside the US - when they know it runs Linux. Add a Microsoft
>> alternative and game is over.
>>
>> "he declined to confirm that with any hard statistics."
>>
>> Why? What's to hide - except his reputation?
>
> Lenovo is dumping the Linux netbooks because they said people keep
> returning them because they think they are broken!
>
> How true.
>
> Linux *is* broken.
>
No, it isn't.

(Snip)

--
Rick

Snit · External Since: Jan 09, 2009 Posts: 261

Rick stated in post uIOdnZg9Yv9k_m7XnZ2dnUVZ_v2dnZ2d DeleteThis @supernews.com on
11/5/09 4:47 PM:

....
>> Linux *is* broken.
>>
> No, it isn't.

Nothing to fix at all?

--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]

Rick · External Since: Oct 18, 2009 Posts: 83

On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 17:36:18 +0100, Hadron wrote:

> Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc.DeleteThis@launchmodem.com> writes:
>
>> Rick pulled this Usenet boner:
>>
>>> Linux's share of netbooks surging, not sagging, says analyst
>>>
>>> <http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9140343/
>>> Linux_s_share_of_netbooks_surging_not_sagging_says_analyst>
>>>
>>> "Nearly one-third of the 35 million netbooks on track to ship this
>>> year will come with some variant of the free, open-source operating
>>> system, ABI Research said."
>>>
>>> well, now.... almost a third with Linux systems... but the wintrolls
>>> say no one wants netbooks with Linux systems.
>>>
>>> So, will the wintrolls attack the article, or just ignore it and hope
>>> no one notices?
>>
>> The WinTrolls can still take solace in the 1%. Very Happy

>
> Looks like the resident kiss arse didn't read the article he's now
> shilling. No surprise there.
>
> 1) Netbooks are a smaller percentage of PCs. 2) "Orr said Ubuntu is a
> popular choice on netbooks, though he declined to confirm that with any
> hard statistics.". Surprise eh? 3) "As netbooks running the ARM
> processor become a major factor, Orr predicted Linux will overtake
> Windows on netbooks by 2013". Predicted. 4) "In a statement, Microsoft
> maintained that "over 93% of worldwide small notebook PCs run Windows
> today.".
>
> In fact the only figures he backs up is
>
> 5) "ABI said its 35 million shipment figure is a reaffirmation of an
> earlier forecast that itself was a slight tweak of its January forecast
> of 39 million netbook shipments in 2009."
>
> No mention of Linux there.

No Linux advocacy from Quark here.

--
Rick

Rick · External Since: Oct 18, 2009 Posts: 83

On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 01:15:27 +0100, Hadron wrote:

> Rick <none.TakeThisOut@mail.invalid> writes:
>
>> On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 17:36:18 +0100, Hadron wrote:
>>
>>> Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc.TakeThisOut@launchmodem.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> Rick pulled this Usenet boner:
>>>>
>>>>> Linux's share of netbooks surging, not sagging, says analyst
>>>>>
>>>>> <http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9140343/
>>>>> Linux_s_share_of_netbooks_surging_not_sagging_says_analyst>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Nearly one-third of the 35 million netbooks on track to ship this
>>>>> year will come with some variant of the free, open-source operating
>>>>> system, ABI Research said."
>>>>>
>>>>> well, now.... almost a third with Linux systems... but the wintrolls
>>>>> say no one wants netbooks with Linux systems.
>>>>>
>>>>> So, will the wintrolls attack the article, or just ignore it and
>>>>> hope no one notices?
>>>>
>>>> The WinTrolls can still take solace in the 1%. Very Happy

>>>
>>> Looks like the resident kiss arse didn't read the article he's now
>>> shilling. No surprise there.
>>>
>>> 1) Netbooks are a smaller percentage of PCs. 2) "Orr said Ubuntu is a
>>> popular choice on netbooks, though he declined to confirm that with
>>> any hard statistics.". Surprise eh? 3) "As netbooks running the ARM
>>> processor become a major factor, Orr predicted Linux will overtake
>>> Windows on netbooks by 2013". Predicted. 4) "In a statement, Microsoft
>>> maintained that "over 93% of worldwide small notebook PCs run Windows
>>> today.".
>>>
>>> In fact the only figures he backs up is
>>>
>>> 5) "ABI said its 35 million shipment figure is a reaffirmation of an
>>> earlier forecast that itself was a slight tweak of its January
>>> forecast of 39 million netbook shipments in 2009."
>>>
>>> No mention of Linux there.
>>
>> No Linux advocacy from Quark here.
>
> No there isn't.
>
> But there was bullshit and lies that needed to be corrected. Telling
> lies about the number of Linux netbooks is NOT Linux advocacy. Now stop
> coming out with your usual copy cat cliches and try to think for
> yourself.

Another example of "Linux Advocacy" from Quark.

--
Rick

Rick · External Since: Oct 18, 2009 Posts: 83

On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 16:59:12 -0700, Snit wrote:

> Rick stated in post uIOdnZg9Yv9k_m7XnZ2dnUVZ_v2dnZ2d.TakeThisOut@supernews.com on
> 11/5/09 4:47 PM:
>
> ...
>>> Linux *is* broken.
>>>
>> No, it isn't.
>
> Nothing to fix at all?

Sod off, Snit. You know what I meant.

--
Rick

Snit · External Since: Jan 09, 2009 Posts: 261

Rick stated in post 5rGdnS-_tK7O5G7XnZ2dnUVZ_qRi4p2d.RemoveThis@supernews.com on
11/5/09 6:18 PM:

> On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 16:59:12 -0700, Snit wrote:
>
>> Rick stated in post uIOdnZg9Yv9k_m7XnZ2dnUVZ_v2dnZ2d.RemoveThis@supernews.com on
>> 11/5/09 4:47 PM:
>>
>> ...
>>>> Linux *is* broken.
>>>>
>>> No, it isn't.
>>
>> Nothing to fix at all?
>
> Sod off, Snit. You know what I meant.

You do have a history of running from intrinsic problems with desktop
Linux...

--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]

Hadron · External Since: Dec 05, 2006 Posts: 495

Rick <none DeleteThis @mail.invalid> writes:

> On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 17:36:18 +0100, Hadron wrote:
>
>> Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc DeleteThis @launchmodem.com> writes:
>>
>>> Rick pulled this Usenet boner:
>>>
>>>> Linux's share of netbooks surging, not sagging, says analyst
>>>>
>>>> <http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9140343/
>>>> Linux_s_share_of_netbooks_surging_not_sagging_says_analyst>
>>>>
>>>> "Nearly one-third of the 35 million netbooks on track to ship this
>>>> year will come with some variant of the free, open-source operating
>>>> system, ABI Research said."
>>>>
>>>> well, now.... almost a third with Linux systems... but the wintrolls
>>>> say no one wants netbooks with Linux systems.
>>>>
>>>> So, will the wintrolls attack the article, or just ignore it and hope
>>>> no one notices?
>>>
>>> The WinTrolls can still take solace in the 1%. Very Happy

>>
>> Looks like the resident kiss arse didn't read the article he's now
>> shilling. No surprise there.
>>
>> 1) Netbooks are a smaller percentage of PCs. 2) "Orr said Ubuntu is a
>> popular choice on netbooks, though he declined to confirm that with any
>> hard statistics.". Surprise eh? 3) "As netbooks running the ARM
>> processor become a major factor, Orr predicted Linux will overtake
>> Windows on netbooks by 2013". Predicted. 4) "In a statement, Microsoft
>> maintained that "over 93% of worldwide small notebook PCs run Windows
>> today.".
>>
>> In fact the only figures he backs up is
>>
>> 5) "ABI said its 35 million shipment figure is a reaffirmation of an
>> earlier forecast that itself was a slight tweak of its January forecast
>> of 39 million netbook shipments in 2009."
>>
>> No mention of Linux there.
>
> No Linux advocacy from Quark here.

No there isn't.

But there was bullshit and lies that needed to be corrected. Telling
lies about the number of Linux netbooks is NOT Linux advocacy. Now stop
coming out with your usual copy cat cliches and try to think for
yourself.

Chris Ahlstrom · External Since: Jan 08, 2009 Posts: 484

Rick pulled this Usenet boner:

> On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 01:15:27 +0100, Hadron wrote:
>
>>>>>> <http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9140343/Linux_s_share_of_netbooks_surging_not_sagging_says_analyst>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Nearly one-third of the 35 million netbooks on track to ship this
>>>>>> year will come with some variant of the free, open-source operating
>>>>>> system, ABI Research said."
>>
>> But there was bullshit and lies that needed to be corrected. Telling
>> lies about the number of Linux netbooks is NOT Linux advocacy. Now stop
>> coming out with your usual copy cat cliches and try to think for
>> yourself.
>
> Another example of "Linux Advocacy" from Quark.

I didn't see "Hadron" posting a comment at that ComputerWorld URL
accusing them of lies.

Why not?

--
O, it is excellent
To have a giant's strength; but it is tyrannous
To use it like a giant.
-- Shakespeare, "Measure for Measure", II, 2

Rick · External Since: Oct 18, 2009 Posts: 83

On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 18:36:39 -0700, Snit wrote:

> Rick stated in post 5rGdnS-_tK7O5G7XnZ2dnUVZ_qRi4p2d RemoveThis @supernews.com on
> 11/5/09 6:18 PM:
>
>> On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 16:59:12 -0700, Snit wrote:
>>
>>> Rick stated in post uIOdnZg9Yv9k_m7XnZ2dnUVZ_v2dnZ2d RemoveThis @supernews.com on
>>> 11/5/09 4:47 PM:
>>>
>>> ...
>>>>> Linux *is* broken.
>>>>>
>>>> No, it isn't.
>>>
>>> Nothing to fix at all?
>>
>> Sod off, Snit. You know what I meant.
>
> You do have a history of running from intrinsic problems with desktop
> Linux...

You have a history of lying your butt off.

--
Rick

Snit · External Since: Jan 09, 2009 Posts: 261

Rick stated in post 5rGdnS6_tK7FL27XnZ2dnUVZ_qRi4p2d.DeleteThis@supernews.com on
11/5/09 10:21 PM:

> On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 18:36:39 -0700, Snit wrote:
>
>> Rick stated in post 5rGdnS-_tK7O5G7XnZ2dnUVZ_qRi4p2d.DeleteThis@supernews.com on
>> 11/5/09 6:18 PM:
>>
>>> On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 16:59:12 -0700, Snit wrote:
>>>
>>>> Rick stated in post uIOdnZg9Yv9k_m7XnZ2dnUVZ_v2dnZ2d.DeleteThis@supernews.com on
>>>> 11/5/09 4:47 PM:
>>>>
>>>> ...
>>>>>> Linux *is* broken.
>>>>>>
>>>>> No, it isn't.
>>>>
>>>> Nothing to fix at all?
>>>
>>> Sod off, Snit. You know what I meant.
>>
>> You do have a history of running from intrinsic problems with desktop
>> Linux...
>
> You have a history of lying your butt off.
>
>
So you say... but can never find any examples. Do you want me to find
examples of you running from intrinsic problems with desktop Linux... where
you jump to external issues such as unfair MS tactics, "herd mentality" and
your other mantras? Easy to do!

--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]

Rick · External Since: Oct 18, 2009 Posts: 83

On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 21:08:40 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

> Rick pulled this Usenet boner:
>
>> On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 01:15:27 +0100, Hadron wrote:
>>
>>>>>>> <http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9140343/
Linux_s_share_of_netbooks_surging_not_sagging_says_analyst>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Nearly one-third of the 35 million netbooks on track to ship this
>>>>>>> year will come with some variant of the free, open-source
>>>>>>> operating system, ABI Research said."
>>>
>>> But there was bullshit and lies that needed to be corrected. Telling
>>> lies about the number of Linux netbooks is NOT Linux advocacy. Now
>>> stop coming out with your usual copy cat cliches and try to think for
>>> yourself.
>>
>> Another example of "Linux Advocacy" from Quark.
>
> I didn't see "Hadron" posting a comment at that ComputerWorld URL
> accusing them of lies.
>
> Why not?

Who knows ....?

--
Rick

Rick · External Since: Oct 18, 2009 Posts: 83

On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 23:20:38 -0700, Snit wrote:

> Rick stated in post 5rGdnS6_tK7FL27XnZ2dnUVZ_qRi4p2d RemoveThis @supernews.com on
> 11/5/09 10:21 PM:
>
>> On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 18:36:39 -0700, Snit wrote:
>>
>>> Rick stated in post 5rGdnS-_tK7O5G7XnZ2dnUVZ_qRi4p2d RemoveThis @supernews.com on
>>> 11/5/09 6:18 PM:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 16:59:12 -0700, Snit wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Rick stated in post uIOdnZg9Yv9k_m7XnZ2dnUVZ_v2dnZ2d RemoveThis @supernews.com
>>>>> on 11/5/09 4:47 PM:
>>>>>
>>>>> ...
>>>>>>> Linux *is* broken.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> No, it isn't.
>>>>>
>>>>> Nothing to fix at all?
>>>>
>>>> Sod off, Snit. You know what I meant.
>>>
>>> You do have a history of running from intrinsic problems with desktop
>>> Linux...
>>
>> You have a history of lying your butt off.
>>
>>
> So you say... but can never find any examples. Do you want me to find
> examples of you running from intrinsic problems with desktop Linux...
> where you jump to external issues such as unfair MS tactics, "herd
> mentality" and your other mantras? Easy to do!

Post whatever you want. You will just continue to show that almost all of
the "intrinsic problems" you whine about are trivial compared to things
such as Microsoft's anti-competitive tactics, inertia and herd mentality,
and your complete lack of understanding of them.

You also show your ego-centrism by accusing me of using "mantras" while
copy/paste ad nauseum.

So, go ahead, have your last word as your ego requires.

--
Rick