Help!

[GIT PULL] scheduler fixes

 
  

Post new topic   General Reply to Topic (not reply to a specific post)    Forums Home -> Kernel RSS
Next:  [GIT PULL] tracing fixes  
Author Message
Ingo Molnar
External


Since: May 15, 2006
Posts: 3111



PostPosted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 12:10 pm    Post subject: [GIT PULL] scheduler fixes
Archived from groups: linux>kernel (more info?)

Linus,

Please pull the latest sched-fixes-for-linus git tree from:

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip.git sched-fixes-for-linus

Two throughput regression fixes and two fixes.

Thanks,

Ingo

------------------>
Mike Galbraith (3):
sched: Strengthen buddies and mitigate buddy induced latencies
sched: Disable SD_PREFER_LOCAL at node level
sched: Fix kthread_bind() by moving the body of kthread_bind() to sched.c

Rusty Russell (1):
sched: Fix boot crash by zalloc()ing most of the cpu masks


arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h | 2 +-
kernel/kthread.c | 23 ------------
kernel/sched.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++--
kernel/sched_fair.c | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
4 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h
index d823c24..40e37b1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h
@@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ extern unsigned long node_remap_size[];
| 1*SD_BALANCE_FORK \
| 0*SD_BALANCE_WAKE \
| 1*SD_WAKE_AFFINE \
- | 1*SD_PREFER_LOCAL \
+ | 0*SD_PREFER_LOCAL \
| 0*SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER \
| 0*SD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE \
| 0*SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES \
diff --git a/kernel/kthread.c b/kernel/kthread.c
index 5fe7099..ab7ae57 100644
--- a/kernel/kthread.c
+++ b/kernel/kthread.c
@@ -150,29 +150,6 @@ struct task_struct *kthread_create(int (*threadfn)(void *data),
EXPORT_SYMBOL(kthread_create);

/**
- * kthread_bind - bind a just-created kthread to a cpu.
- * @k: thread created by kthread_create().
- * @cpu: cpu (might not be online, must be possible) for @k to run on.
- *
- * Description: This function is equivalent to set_cpus_allowed(),
- * except that @cpu doesn't need to be online, and the thread must be
- * stopped (i.e., just returned from kthread_create()).
- */
-void kthread_bind(struct task_struct *k, unsigned int cpu)
-{
- /* Must have done schedule() in kthread() before we set_task_cpu */
- if (!wait_task_inactive(k, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE)) {
- WARN_ON(1);
- return;
- }
- set_task_cpu(k, cpu);
- k->cpus_allowed = cpumask_of_cpu(cpu);
- k->rt.nr_cpus_allowed = 1;
- k->flags |= PF_THREAD_BOUND;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(kthread_bind);
-
-/**
* kthread_stop - stop a thread created by kthread_create().
* @k: thread created by kthread_create().
*
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index 789001d..5cb7d63 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -1996,6 +1996,38 @@ static inline void check_class_changed(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
p->sched_class->prio_changed(rq, p, oldprio, running);
}

+/**
+ * kthread_bind - bind a just-created kthread to a cpu.
+ * @k: thread created by kthread_create().
+ * @cpu: cpu (might not be online, must be possible) for @k to run on.
+ *
+ * Description: This function is equivalent to set_cpus_allowed(),
+ * except that @cpu doesn't need to be online, and the thread must be
+ * stopped (i.e., just returned from kthread_create()).
+ *
+ * Function lives here instead of kthread.c because it messes with
+ * scheduler internals which require locking.
+ */
+void kthread_bind(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int cpu)
+{
+ struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ /* Must have done schedule() in kthread() before we set_task_cpu */
+ if (!wait_task_inactive(p, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE)) {
+ WARN_ON(1);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&rq->lock, flags);
+ set_task_cpu(p, cpu);
+ p->cpus_allowed = cpumask_of_cpu(cpu);
+ p->rt.nr_cpus_allowed = 1;
+ p->flags |= PF_THREAD_BOUND;
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rq->lock, flags);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(kthread_bind);
+
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
/*
* Is this task likely cache-hot:
@@ -2008,7 +2040,7 @@ task_hot(struct task_struct *p, u64 now, struct sched_domain *sd)
/*
* Buddy candidates are cache hot:
*/
- if (sched_feat(CACHE_HOT_BUDDY) &&
+ if (sched_feat(CACHE_HOT_BUDDY) && this_rq()->nr_running &&
(&p->se == cfs_rq_of(&p->se)->next ||
&p->se == cfs_rq_of(&p->se)->last))
return 1;
@@ -9535,13 +9567,13 @@ void __init sched_init(void)
current->sched_class = &fair_sched_class;

/* Allocate the nohz_cpu_mask if CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK */
- alloc_cpumask_var(&nohz_cpu_mask, GFP_NOWAIT);
+ zalloc_cpumask_var(&nohz_cpu_mask, GFP_NOWAIT);
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ
- alloc_cpumask_var(&nohz.cpu_mask, GFP_NOWAIT);
+ zalloc_cpumask_var(&nohz.cpu_mask, GFP_NOWAIT);
alloc_cpumask_var(&nohz.ilb_grp_nohz_mask, GFP_NOWAIT);
#endif
- alloc_cpumask_var(&cpu_isolated_map, GFP_NOWAIT);
+ zalloc_cpumask_var(&cpu_isolated_map, GFP_NOWAIT);
#endif /* SMP */

perf_event_init();
diff --git a/kernel/sched_fair.c b/kernel/sched_fair.c
index c32c3e6..37087a7 100644
--- a/kernel/sched_fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_fair.c
@@ -822,6 +822,26 @@ check_preempt_tick(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *curr)
* re-elected due to buddy favours.
*/
clear_buddies(cfs_rq, curr);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Ensure that a task that missed wakeup preemption by a
+ * narrow margin doesn't have to wait for a full slice.
+ * This also mitigates buddy induced latencies under load.
+ */
+ if (!sched_feat(WAKEUP_PREEMPT))
+ return;
+
+ if (delta_exec < sysctl_sched_min_granularity)
+ return;
+
+ if (cfs_rq->nr_running > 1) {
+ struct sched_entity *se = __pick_next_entity(cfs_rq);
+ s64 delta = curr->vruntime - se->vruntime;
+
+ if (delta > ideal_runtime)
+ resched_task(rq_of(cfs_rq)->curr);
}
}

@@ -861,21 +881,18 @@ wakeup_preempt_entity(struct sched_entity *curr, struct sched_entity *se);
static struct sched_entity *pick_next_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
{
struct sched_entity *se = __pick_next_entity(cfs_rq);
- struct sched_entity *buddy;
+ struct sched_entity *left = se;

- if (cfs_rq->next) {
- buddy = cfs_rq->next;
- cfs_rq->next = NULL;
- if (wakeup_preempt_entity(buddy, se) < 1)
- return buddy;
- }
+ if (cfs_rq->next && wakeup_preempt_entity(cfs_rq->next, left) < 1)
+ se = cfs_rq->next;

- if (cfs_rq->last) {
- buddy = cfs_rq->last;
- cfs_rq->last = NULL;
- if (wakeup_preempt_entity(buddy, se) < 1)
- return buddy;
- }
+ /*
+ * Prefer last buddy, try to return the CPU to a preempted task.
+ */
+ if (cfs_rq->last && wakeup_preempt_entity(cfs_rq->last, left) < 1)
+ se = cfs_rq->last;
+
+ clear_buddies(cfs_rq, se);

return se;
}
@@ -1577,6 +1594,7 @@ static void check_preempt_wakeup(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int wake_
struct sched_entity *se = &curr->se, *pse = &p->se;
struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = task_cfs_rq(curr);
int sync = wake_flags & WF_SYNC;
+ int scale = cfs_rq->nr_running >= sched_nr_latency;

update_curr(cfs_rq);

@@ -1591,18 +1609,7 @@ static void check_preempt_wakeup(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int wake_
if (unlikely(se == pse))
return;

- /*
- * Only set the backward buddy when the current task is still on the
- * rq. This can happen when a wakeup gets interleaved with schedule on
- * the ->pre_schedule() or idle_balance() point, either of which can
- * drop the rq lock.
- *
- * Also, during early boot the idle thread is in the fair class, for
- * obvious reasons its a bad idea to schedule back to the idle thread.
- */
- if (sched_feat(LAST_BUDDY) && likely(se->on_rq && curr != rq->idle))
- set_last_buddy(se);
- if (sched_feat(NEXT_BUDDY) && !(wake_flags & WF_FORK))
+ if (sched_feat(NEXT_BUDDY) && scale && !(wake_flags & WF_FORK))
set_next_buddy(pse);

/*
@@ -1648,8 +1655,22 @@ static void check_preempt_wakeup(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int wake_

BUG_ON(!pse);

- if (wakeup_preempt_entity(se, pse) == 1)
+ if (wakeup_preempt_entity(se, pse) == 1) {
resched_task(curr);
+ /*
+ * Only set the backward buddy when the current task is still
+ * on the rq. This can happen when a wakeup gets interleaved
+ * with schedule on the ->pre_schedule() or idle_balance()
+ * point, either of which can * drop the rq lock.
+ *
+ * Also, during early boot the idle thread is in the fair class,
+ * for obvious reasons its a bad idea to schedule back to it.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(!se->on_rq || curr == rq->idle))
+ return;
+ if (sched_feat(LAST_BUDDY) && scale && entity_is_task(se))
+ set_last_buddy(se);
+ }
}

static struct task_struct *pick_next_task_fair(struct rq *rq)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo DeleteThis @vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   General Reply to Topic (not reply to a specific post)    Forums Home -> Kernel All times are: Eastern Time (US & Canada) (change)
Page 1 of 1

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum