On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Package: libttspico0
> Version: 1.0+git20100205-1
> Severity: normal
> The pico2wave command should probably not be packaged along the library,
> but as a separate libttspico-utils package (or maybe just pico2wave)
Thanks for your bug report.
I was wondering if having a so tiny package is relevant (Uncompressed
libttspico0 is currently 388 ko pico2wave being 9.9 ko of it). Asked
on IRC, I now understand the deep reason for this (see below).
I will fix this in an uncoming version.
As you are maintainer of various accessibility and TTS software in
Debian, would you join me to maintain SVOX Pico?
(14:08:42) sathieu1: hello, is there a rule to split binaries out of
lib packages? (Especialy when the lib package is tiny...)
(14:09:51) Mithrandir: sathieu1: yes, how else can you bump soname and
not conflict with the previous version?
micah michi mick_laptop midget mikap Mithrandir
(14:12:22) sathieu1: Mithrandir: if I have a "Provide: pkg-bin" in
libpkg0 isn't is sufficient?
(14:12:35) azeem_: sathieu1: pgk-bin?
(14:12:46) ol: sathieu1: no, because libfoo0 and libfoo1 will both
have the same file in
sathieu1: (okay, pkg is not a good example: real example is
(14:14:06) sathieu1: ol: okay I understand now. Thanks
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-REQUEST.TakeThisOut@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster.TakeThisOut@lists.debian.org