|
|
| Next: [Auto-Reply] test |
| Author |
Message |
Loïc
External
Since: Nov 11, 2004
Posts: 475
|
 Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 6:01 am Post subject: Re: GNOME 2.16 in Experimental [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: linux>debian>maint>gtk>gnome (more info?) |
|
|
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> Apparently libeel's situation is a mess. Nautilus is depending on
> libeel2-2 (not libeel2-2.16), which depends on the very same libeel2-
> data than the others, but of course >= 2.16.
Yeah; that was to be expected by the package name change; I don't feel
like requesting bin NMUs for experimental as the release managers are
overworked, and I don't feel like doing a binary rebuild of nautilus
and others. This should fix itself with the next nautilus upload.
--
Loïc Minier <lool.RemoveThis@dooz.org>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gtk-gnome-REQUEST.RemoveThis@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster.RemoveThis@lists.debian.org |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Xavier Bestel
External
Since: Nov 10, 2004
Posts: 196
|
Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 8:02 am Post subject: Re: GNOME 2.16 in Experimental [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?) |
|
|
On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 10:23 +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2007, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> > Apparently libeel's situation is a mess. Nautilus is depending on
> > libeel2-2 (not libeel2-2.16), which depends on the very same libeel2-
> > data than the others, but of course >= 2.16.
>
> Yeah; that was to be expected by the package name change; I don't feel
> like requesting bin NMUs for experimental as the release managers are
> overworked, and I don't feel like doing a binary rebuild of nautilus
> and others. This should fix itself with the next nautilus upload.
Ok. Back to hibernation mode then, patiently waiting for an installable
gnome 2.16.
Thanks,
Xav |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Loïc
External
Since: Nov 11, 2004
Posts: 475
|
Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 10:03 am Post subject: Re: GNOME 2.16 in Experimental [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?) |
|
|
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> Ok. Back to hibernation mode then, patiently waiting for an installable
> gnome 2.16.
Haha, never mind, I've uploaded nautilus 2.16.3-5 for i386 and made it
autobuildable! (I thought it already was and the buildd was slacking.)
And you thought you could take some rest.
--
Loïc Minier <lool.TakeThisOut@dooz.org>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gtk-gnome-REQUEST.TakeThisOut@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster.TakeThisOut@lists.debian.org |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Amaya
External
Since: Dec 28, 2004
Posts: 264
|
Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 2:02 pm Post subject: Re: GNOME 2.16 in Experimental [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?) |
|
|
Loïc Minier wrote:
> Haha, never mind, I've uploaded nautilus 2.16.3-5 for i386 and made
> it autobuildable! (I thought it already was and the buildd was
> slacking.)
:*
--
·''`. If I can't dance to it, it's not my revolution
: :' : -- Emma Goldman
`. `' Proudly running Debian GNU/Linux (unstable)
`- www.amayita.com www.malapecora.com www.chicasduras.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gtk-gnome-REQUEST.RemoveThis@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster.RemoveThis@lists.debian.org |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Xavier Bestel
External
Since: Nov 10, 2004
Posts: 196
|
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 6:01 am Post subject: Re: GNOME 2.16 in Experimental [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?) |
|
|
On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 13:45 +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> I've uploaded nautilus 2.16.3-5 for i386 and made it
> autobuildable! (I thought it already was and the buildd was slacking.)
Yess !! You made it, today is the first day of gnome 2.16 on debian 
"aptitude -t experimental install gnome" worked perfectly.
Thanks a lot to everyone involved.
Xav |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Loïc
External
Since: Nov 11, 2004
Posts: 475
|
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 11:02 am Post subject: Re: GNOME 2.16 in Experimental [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?) |
|
|
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> Yess !! You made it, today is the first day of gnome 2.16 on debian
> "aptitude -t experimental install gnome" worked perfectly.
I confirm, I just did a full sid -> experimental upgrade of the GNOME
packages (well, anything pulled by gnome-desktop-environment 2.16), and
it went nicely.
--
Loïc Minier <lool.RemoveThis@dooz.org>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gtk-gnome-REQUEST.RemoveThis@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster.RemoveThis@lists.debian.org |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Xavier Bestel
External
Since: Nov 10, 2004
Posts: 196
|
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 11:02 am Post subject: Re: GNOME 2.16 in Experimental [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?) |
|
|
On Wed, 2007-03-14 at 14:42 +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2007, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> > Yess !! You made it, today is the first day of gnome 2.16 on debian
> > "aptitude -t experimental install gnome" worked perfectly.
>
> I confirm, I just did a full sid -> experimental upgrade of the GNOME
> packages (well, anything pulled by gnome-desktop-environment 2.16), and
> it went nicely.
Even gnome (which pulls gnome-desktop-environment, gnome-office, gnome-
games, etc.) upgrades to experimental fine.
Xav |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jean-Christophe Dubacq
External
Since: Dec 06, 2004
Posts: 65
|
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 12:02 pm Post subject: Re: GNOME 2.16 in Experimental [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?) |
|
|
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 02:54:25PM +0100, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-03-14 at 14:42 +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 14, 2007, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> > > Yess !! You made it, today is the first day of gnome 2.16 on debian
> > > "aptitude -t experimental install gnome" worked perfectly.
> >
> > I confirm, I just did a full sid -> experimental upgrade of the GNOME
> > packages (well, anything pulled by gnome-desktop-environment 2.16), and
> > it went nicely.
>
> Even gnome (which pulls gnome-desktop-environment, gnome-office, gnome-
> games, etc.) upgrades to experimental fine.
I had to pull by hand some packages though:
gnome-theme-extra
metacity (maybe because I had a hand-built package of compiz)
evolutions-plugins (even if evolution upgraded cleanly)
'~n gstreamer0.10' (but maybe gstreamer is not considered part of gnome)
gnome-desktop-data
service-discovery-applet (obviously not part of gnome) and avahi*
--
Jean-Christophe Dubacq
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gtk-gnome-REQUEST.TakeThisOut@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster.TakeThisOut@lists.debian.org |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jean-Christophe Dubacq
External
Since: Dec 06, 2004
Posts: 65
|
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 12:02 pm Post subject: Re: GNOME 2.16 in Experimental [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?) |
|
|
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 03:25:27PM +0100, Jean-Christophe Dubacq wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 02:54:25PM +0100, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-03-14 at 14:42 +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 14, 2007, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> > > > Yess !! You made it, today is the first day of gnome 2.16 on debian
> > > > "aptitude -t experimental install gnome" worked perfectly.
> > >
> > > I confirm, I just did a full sid -> experimental upgrade of the GNOME
> > > packages (well, anything pulled by gnome-desktop-environment 2.16), and
> > > it went nicely.
> >
> > Even gnome (which pulls gnome-desktop-environment, gnome-office, gnome-
> > games, etc.) upgrades to experimental fine.
>
> I had to pull by hand some packages though:
>
> gnome-theme-extra
> metacity (maybe because I had a hand-built package of compiz)
> evolutions-plugins (even if evolution upgraded cleanly)
> '~n gstreamer0.10' (but maybe gstreamer is not considered part of gnome)
> gnome-desktop-data
> service-discovery-applet (obviously not part of gnome) and avahi*
And I could not update seahorse, since it removes gnupg-agent, and some
of my users depend on this package (KDE => gnupg-agent).
This is because of
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=407800
which seems to me badly handled.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gtk-gnome-REQUEST.TakeThisOut@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster.TakeThisOut@lists.debian.org |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jcdubacq1
External
Since: Mar 16, 2007
Posts: 1
|
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 3:00 am Post subject: Re: GNOME 2.16 in Experimental [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?) |
|
|
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 07:38:53PM +0100, Marco Cabizza wrote:
> Il giorno mer, 14/03/2007 alle 15.25 +0100, Jean-Christophe Dubacq ha
> scritto:
> > I had to pull by hand some packages though:
> >
> > gnome-theme-extra
> > metacity (maybe because I had a hand-built package of compiz)
> > evolutions-plugins (even if evolution upgraded cleanly)
> > '~n gstreamer0.10' (but maybe gstreamer is not considered part of gnome)
> > gnome-desktop-data
> > service-discovery-applet (obviously not part of gnome) and avahi*
>
> Metacity in experimental conflicts with compiz though. Can you still
> use both of them, and which compiz version are you using ? Maybe the
> conflict with metacity can be removed with a patch if the compiz git
> version has no such problems.
I will test it today. In fact, I came back to metacity (after trying beryl
and compiz) because I had problems with both (but it was two early
versions, so maybe it is better nowadays).
But compiz 0.2.2-1 is co-installable with metacity.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gtk-gnome-REQUEST.DeleteThis@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster.DeleteThis@lists.debian.org |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Michel Dänzer
External
Since: May 14, 2006
Posts: 397
|
Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 6:01 am Post subject: Re: GNOME 2.16 in Experimental [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?) |
|
|
On Thu, 2007-03-15 at 19:38 +0100, Marco Cabizza wrote:
>
> Metacity in experimental conflicts with compiz though. Can you still
> use both of them, and which compiz version are you using ? Maybe the
> conflict with metacity can be removed with a patch if the compiz git
> version has no such problems.
The conflict is there due to an ABI breakage in libmetacity0, so when
building compiz against a newer version, the conflict should be changed
against the older versions.
Some people even claimed that compiz in experimental fixes the problem
altogether, rendering the conflict moot, but I haven't seen any evidence
to substantiate that.
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://tungstengraphics.com
Libre software enthusiast | Debian, X and DRI developer |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
| |
|
|
Linux