Help!

How is John McCain's Affair Different from John Edwards'?


Goto page 1, 2
Post new topic   General Reply to Topic (not reply to a specific post)    Forums Home -> Political Geeks RSS
Next:  The John McCain Loyalty Quiz  
Author Message
mommabear



Joined: Feb 20, 2003
Posts: 6185



PostPosted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 2:14 pm    Post subject: How is John McCain's Affair Different from John Edwards'?

Quote:
by Cenk Uygur

Posted August 8, 2008 | 04:41 PM (EST)
We have this weird notion in America now that if a politician is caught in an affair that his career is done. We seem to be saying that what he did in his private life effects his policies or how he governs. But we all know that isn't true. We know that because almost all of our great presidents, and great leaders throughout history, have had numerous affairs. Obviously it didn't hurt how they governed at all. ...

Does John Edwards care less about poor people today than he did yesterday? Would his affair lead him to change his position on NAFTA? How would it alter his policy on Iran? ...

... Every man that has ever cheated on his wife has lied (and so has every woman who has ever cheated). It is part and parcel of the affair.

Now, we get to the most relevant question - if John Edwards' political career is done, why isn't John McCain's? John McCain had a well-documented affair on his first wife, with his current wife. He has admitted in the books he has written about his life that he ran around with several different women while still married to his first wife. And don't forget that he left her for a younger, richer woman - multi-millionaire Cindy Hensley who is now Cindy McCain - after she had been severely hurt in a car accident.

So, why are McCain's actions any more excusable than Edwards'? Because it was thirty years ago? Does that wash it away? Will we be fine with Edwards running for office again in a couple of years because then it will all be in the past? What is the statute of limitations on an affair? ...

So, I want every pundit who condemns John Edwards today to tell me what the difference between him and McCain is and why John McCain shouldn't also be run out of politics for his adulterous affairs and what he did to his first wife.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/cenk-uygur/why-doesnt-john-mccains-a_b_117811.html


Lots of similarities between the two affairs, yet McCain gets a pass. Why is that?
Back to top
kenmabmcc



Joined: Nov 20, 2003
Posts: 7258

Location: Dunedin, New Zealand.

PostPosted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 6:33 pm    Post subject:

I think it is because he is an old man who cheated on his wife many times in the past, abandoned her when she needed support,
and moved to a newer, richer, younger wife.

Every time you get remarried the cheating clock gets reset...
Laughing Laughing Laughing
Back to top
mommabear



Joined: Feb 20, 2003
Posts: 6185



PostPosted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 6:55 pm    Post subject:

Quote:
Every time you get remarried the cheating clock gets reset...

Brilliant! That's a keeper. lol!
Back to top
xavierx



Joined: Nov 06, 2004
Posts: 3871



PostPosted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 9:20 pm    Post subject:

How typical. A Democrat gets caught doing something, and rather than focus on that, you want to focus on what some Republican did 30 years ago. What happened to all your lines about focusing on today when the conservatives who aren't in this forum anymore brought up Clinton or past Democrat Congresses to excuse Bush or the Republican Congress? Talk about hypocritical and hate filled.
Rolling Eyes
Back to top
kenmabmcc



Joined: Nov 20, 2003
Posts: 7258

Location: Dunedin, New Zealand.

PostPosted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 11:41 pm    Post subject:

At this moment,

McCain is running for President,

some Democrat isn't.
Back to top
mommabear



Joined: Feb 20, 2003
Posts: 6185



PostPosted: Tue Aug 12, 2008 5:28 am    Post subject: [Login to view extended thread Info.]

xavierx wrote:
How typical. A Democrat gets caught doing something, and rather than focus on that, you want to focus on what some Republican did 30 years ago.
What happened to all your lines about focusing on today when the conservatives who aren't in this forum anymore brought up Clinton or past Democrat Congresses to excuse Bush or the Republican Congress? Talk about hypocritical and hate filled.
Rolling Eyes


The point of all this is, had McCain gotten the same scrutiny about his affair(s), would he even be running for President now? Would he even be in the Senate?

All this morality crap reached a flash point when the Republicans couldn't find a way to bring down a popular President (and Party) on the issues. They are the ones who have lowered the bar on moral indignation. It had/has nothing to do with an honest sense of propriety. They saw it as a way to "win" without any merit on the real issues, and they went for it with a vengeance.

What does Clinton have to do with defending Bush or the Republican Congress for their indiscretions? Nothing. Yet that has become yours and their battle cry when the morality shoe is on the other foot.

There's your hypocrisy.
Back to top
xavierx



Joined: Nov 06, 2004
Posts: 3871



PostPosted: Tue Aug 12, 2008 7:48 pm    Post subject: [Login to view extended thread Info.]

Show me where I claimed that Clinton doing something excused Bush. If I think it's wrong, I don't care who did it previously. I'm not the one always screaming about paying attention to the present instead of the past - that's yours alone. There's your hypocrisy.

Instead of admitting that Edwards was an idiot, you'd rather try to dig up 30 year old dirt.
Rolling Eyes
Back to top
pasquanel



Joined: Jun 20, 2005
Posts: 398

Location: Maine

PostPosted: Tue Aug 12, 2008 8:34 pm    Post subject: [Login to view extended thread Info.]

I'll meet you both half way! They are both idiots! Right is right and wrong is wrong there is no statute of limitation on this one. Wink
Back to top
xavierx



Joined: Nov 06, 2004
Posts: 3871



PostPosted: Tue Aug 12, 2008 8:51 pm    Post subject: [Login to view extended thread Info.]

Ah, I never said McCain wasn't wrong or an idiot - I said his actions of 30 years ago don't excuse Edwards.

And yes, dirt from 30 years ago is irrelevant - unless we subscribe to the belief that no one can ever change, in which case there's a whole host of reasons not to vote for anyone, ever!
Back to top
mommabear



Joined: Feb 20, 2003
Posts: 6185



PostPosted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 5:45 am    Post subject: [Login to view extended thread Info.]

xavierx wrote:
Ah, I never said McCain wasn't wrong or an idiot - I said his actions of 30 years ago don't excuse Edwards.

And yes, dirt from 30 years ago is irrelevant - unless we subscribe to the belief that no one can ever change, in which case there's a whole host of reasons not to vote for anyone, ever!


No, but you did use the 30 years to excuse McCain by implication. Maybe in another 20 or so, you'll back off of the Clinton excuse. lol!
Back to top
xavierx



Joined: Nov 06, 2004
Posts: 3871



PostPosted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 3:27 pm    Post subject: [Login to view extended thread Info.]

As I said - show me where I used the Clinton excuse. I'm not the one that did that. And I could turn the tables easily - how many times have you excused Pelosi and the rest of the Democrat Congress because of what the Republicans did?
Back to top
mommabear



Joined: Feb 20, 2003
Posts: 6185



PostPosted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 4:09 pm    Post subject: [Login to view extended thread Info.]

And you still have yet to respond to the actual topic. Mainly, if Edwards' political career is dead in the water now, why didn't McCain's die years ago?

Quote:
Lots of similarities between the two affairs, yet McCain gets a pass. Why is that?

The point of all this is, had McCain gotten the same scrutiny about his affair(s), would he even be running for President now? Would he even be in the Senate?
Back to top
xavierx



Joined: Nov 06, 2004
Posts: 3871



PostPosted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 4:25 pm    Post subject: [Login to view extended thread Info.]

I don't know, Mommabear - I don't pay attention to what happened 30 years ago when it's not relevant.

And this is all irrelevant to today. Do you believe that no one can ever change? Is that why you care about what McCain may have done 30 years ago? Or is this just more "passion" against a group of people for no reason other than they belong to another group than you?

And how about answering my questions from earlier? Or do you just want to attack and run again? You made some accusations - back them up or apologize.
Back to top
mommabear



Joined: Feb 20, 2003
Posts: 6185



PostPosted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 7:17 pm    Post subject: [Login to view extended thread Info.]

Why is it not relevant? If McCain wasn't running for president, it wouldn't be relevant. But he is. He makes a big issue of his experience and character qualifying him for the job. He allows his campaign (if not himself) to question his opponent's experience and character.

You say McCain has changed. Has he? He also referred to his current wife as a trollop and called her a c*nt in 1992, during a fit of temper. His aides said then that he was just suffering from a "long day". He's known for his temper. That's no secret.

So why is he exempt from examining his darker side too?
Back to top
xavierx



Joined: Nov 06, 2004
Posts: 3871



PostPosted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 7:47 pm    Post subject: [Login to view extended thread Info.]

Sorry, Mommabear, I didn't realize this was just a bash McCain thread. I thought you wanted to have rational discussions instead of trying to dig up 30 year old "news" and 16 year old rumors based on "anonymous sources". My bad.
Rolling Eyes
Back to top
kenmabmcc



Joined: Nov 20, 2003
Posts: 7258

Location: Dunedin, New Zealand.

PostPosted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 11:58 pm    Post subject: [Login to view extended thread Info.]

McCains bad...not yours...

Comedy Stylings of Shecky McCain
Quote:
I managed to dig up this gem from his 1986 race for US Senate, as quoted in the Tucson Citizen:

Did you hear the one about the woman who is attacked on the street by a gorilla, beaten senseless, r**** repeatedly and left to die? When she finally regains consciousness and tries to speak, her doctor leans over to hear her sigh contently and to feebly ask, ‘Where is that marvelous ape?’

I find r*** jokes are always a sign of class, don’t you?
Back to top
mommabear



Joined: Feb 20, 2003
Posts: 6185



PostPosted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 6:10 am    Post subject: [Login to view extended thread Info.]

xavierx wrote:
Sorry, Mommabear, I didn't realize this was just a bash McCain thread. I thought you wanted to have rational discussions instead of trying to dig up 30 year old "news" and 16 year old rumors based on "anonymous sources". My bad.
Rolling Eyes


Just what is it you're doing when you post articles and make comments critical of Obama and other Democrats?

Oh, I get it now. You're just trying to inform us of all the Democrats' faults and inadequacies. Whereas, McCain apparently has none. Silly me!... for not being able to grasp the obvious distinctions between our motives when we participate in a topic.
Back to top
mommabear



Joined: Feb 20, 2003
Posts: 6185



PostPosted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 6:22 am    Post subject: [Login to view extended thread Info.]

Re: the one anonymous report about his current wife. Mr. Straight Talk Express doesn't deny it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iOl4iT46Eec

Google is full of other reports of temper tantrums and name callings that are not anonymous.
Back to top
xavierx



Joined: Nov 06, 2004
Posts: 3871



PostPosted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 7:18 pm    Post subject: [Login to view extended thread Info.]

Mommabear, feel free to attack McCain all you want. I post news from the present. When you quit focusing on the past, bring up 30 year old dirt as excuses for your party, then come back and talk. After all, that's exactly what you demand of Republican supporters.
Back to top
Sgt Schultz



Joined: Dec 07, 2002
Posts: 6829

Location: St. Louis area

PostPosted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 10:34 pm    Post subject: [Login to view extended thread Info.]

xavierx wrote:
Mommabear, feel free to attack McCain all you want. I post news from the present. When you quit focusing on the past, bring up 30 year old dirt as excuses for your party, then come back and talk. After all, that's exactly what you demand of Republican supporters.


Not directing this at you Xavierx, but your point reminds me how many times I've seen some Republicans yell "Ted Kennedy" & "Chappaquiddick" at the drop of a hat in the same vein; focusing on the past.
Back to top
AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   General Reply to Topic (not reply to a specific post)    Forums Home -> Political Geeks All times are: Eastern Time (US & Canada) (change)
Goto page 1, 2
Page 1 of 2

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum