Help!

Indiana Says 'No Thanks' to Cap and Trade

 
  

Post new topic   General Reply to Topic (not reply to a specific post)    Forums Home -> Political Geeks RSS
Next:  how to remove hard drive -- GTWY M3109 notebook?  
Author Message
tony7914



Joined: Dec 24, 2004
Posts: 4965

Location: Peru Indiana

PostPosted: Sat May 16, 2009 12:10 am    Post subject: Indiana Says 'No Thanks' to Cap and Trade

No honest person thinks this will make a dent in climate change.

Quote:
By MITCH DANIELS
This week Congress is set to release the details of the Waxman-Markey American Clean Energy and Security Act, a bill that purports to combat global warming by setting strict limits on carbon emissions. I'm not a candidate for any office -- now or ever again -- and I've approached the "climate change" debate with an open-mind. But it's clear to me that the nation, and in particular Indiana, my home state, will be terribly disserved by this cap-and-trade policy on the verge of passage in the House.

The largest scientific and economic questions are being addressed by others, so I will confine myself to reporting about how all this looks from the receiving end of the taxes, restrictions and mandates Congress is now proposing.

Quite simply, it looks like imperialism. This bill would impose enormous taxes and restrictions on free commerce by wealthy but faltering powers -- California, Massachusetts and New York -- seeking to exploit politically weaker colonies in order to prop up their own decaying economies. Because proceeds from their new taxes, levied mostly on us, will be spent on their social programs while negatively impacting our economy, we Hoosiers decline to submit meekly......


Source.

The more this man speaks out the better I like him!
Anyone wish to try and defend this cap and trade boondoggle?
Back to top
Yahoo Messenger
Gezzer



Joined: Oct 19, 2008
Posts: 666

Location: Buckinghamshire England

PostPosted: Sat May 16, 2009 8:35 am    Post subject:

we are suffering something similar here
this carbon cap is restricting the building of fuel alternative power stations
power stations that could burn house hold or sewage waste instead of placing house hold waste into land fill and/or allowing raw sewage to flow directly into the north sea

the only thing that they can come up with for our long term energy supply is nuclear power stations
which, itself, creates a massive long term waste/storage problem
and are far more expensive in building then conventional power stations that can use the waste that we already produce and have great difficulty in disposing of …
Back to top
tony7914



Joined: Dec 24, 2004
Posts: 4965

Location: Peru Indiana

PostPosted: Sat May 16, 2009 9:53 am    Post subject: [Login to view extended thread Info.]

Gezzer wrote:
we are suffering something similar here
this carbon cap is restricting the building of fuel alternative power stations
power stations that could burn house hold or sewage waste instead of placing house hold waste into land fill and/or allowing raw sewage to flow directly into the north sea

the only thing that they can come up with for our long term energy supply is nuclear power stations
which, itself, creates a massive long term waste/storage problem
and are far more expensive in building then conventional power stations that can use the waste that we already produce and have great difficulty in disposing of …


Our problems with the use of nuclear energy and the disposal of it's waste center on NIMBY and a fear of a repeat of Chernobyl and 3 mile island I think. I would like to see more nuclear plants be built because it's cheap, reliable, and clean power.
Back to top
Yahoo Messenger
Huapakechi



Joined: Jan 19, 2005
Posts: 487



PostPosted: Sat May 16, 2009 4:51 pm    Post subject: [Login to view extended thread Info.]

Quote:
Our problems with the use of nuclear energy and the disposal of it's waste center on NIMBY and a fear of a repeat of Chernobyl and 3 mile island I think. I would like to see more nuclear plants be built because it's cheap, reliable, and clean power.


Aside from the Yucca Mountain nuclear waste repository currently held hostage by enviro-nazi lawyers, the only reason to not use nuclear power is the huge investment in the facility and distribution system involved. Of course, unnoticed by the screaming monkey crowd is the adaptation of decades old near totally idiot proof technology.

Lo, and the voice spake "Let there be POWER!" (article dated 11/9/2008)
http://www.ask.com/bar?q=Small+safe+nuclear+power+plants&page=1&am...src=0&a

Smaller than a garden shed and capable of powering 20K homes, no moving parts, sealed in concrete, and buried.

<snip>The US government has licensed the technology to Hyperion, a New Mexico-based company which said last week that it has taken its first firm orders and plans to start mass production within five years. 'Our goal is to generate electricity for 10 cents a kilowatt hour anywhere in the world,' said John Deal, chief executive of Hyperion. 'They will cost approximately $25m [£16m] each. For a community with 10,000 households, that is a very affordable $2,500 per home.'<snip>

I guess these are just too cheap, safe, and efficient to be championed by the eco-freak movement. Read about the cloward-piven strategy] for forcing political change through orchestrated crisis http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=6967

The whole aim of the left is to destroy the American economy and nation, by any means necessary.

Prove me wrong.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   General Reply to Topic (not reply to a specific post)    Forums Home -> Political Geeks All times are: Eastern Time (US & Canada) (change)
Page 1 of 1

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum