How much can you hate golf on TV?
I can walk away from the TV for an hour, do something constructive, return, and the score might have changed by one shot (it's actually called a "stroke" but I don't want to go out of my way to invite crass comments).
But this weekend it's Tiger Woods (#1) vs. Vijay Singh (#2). As of the end of the day on Friday Tiger led Vijay by one shot. This is the one on one matchup we have waited for all year.
And as far as it being a boring sport, if you don't play it don't bother reading any further. Seriously, just stop right now. If you read any more I assume you want to hear my opinion on why golf is exciting.
Take a high scoring game like basketball. Two or three hours, maybe 100 points scored on each side, and if you're lucky it goes into overtime and one team wins by one or two points.
Now look at golf. Four 18 hole rounds over four days. Each round takes four hours to play - sixteen hours of play for each player.
Of course you don't watch all sixteen hours (I don't even watch sixteen hours), but then you come down to the final round on Sunday. By the time it comes on TV there are only two or three hours left (much like a basketball game, except that someone already has a two or three shot lead).
Now let's translate basketball "points" into golf "strokes". A basketball game, as we observed, is won with about 100 points with a margin of victory of about 5 points. A golf tournament is won with about 270 shots with a margin of victory of 1-3 shots. The margin of victory often comes down to the last two or three holes. And it's not just two teams, its 70 individuals.
If you don't like golf you should have taken my advice and stopped reading when I told you to. If you read this far you know why I think golf is more exciting than chess or watching paint dry.
I should have mentioned, televised golf is much better if you have an ample supply of alcoholic beverages.
Next installment - Golf playoffs! Extra holes equals more liquor!